Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Saline County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 904
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Saline County, Missouri totaled $5,644,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Ralph Durham | Nelson, MO 65347 | $21,386 |
62 | Kurtis Nathaniel Gregory | Marshall, MO 65340 | $21,326 |
63 | Nelson Weber And Janie Weber Rev Living Trust | Marshall, MO 65340 | $20,862 |
64 | Jeffrey Thomas Mccracken | Marshall, MO 65340 | $20,550 |
65 | Joe Thompson | Marshall, MO 65340 | $20,254 |
66 | Mendell Lee Elson | Miami, MO 65344 | $20,179 |
67 | Shannon B & Georgia M Smith Family LLC | Slater, MO 65349 | $20,142 |
68 | Gary Lee Riley | Marshall, MO 65340 | $19,952 |
69 | Dustin J Schuster | Blackwater, MO 65322 | $19,721 |
70 | Dierking Farms LLC | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $19,315 |
71 | Derek Davis LLC | Nelson, MO 65347 | $19,263 |
72 | Gary Edward Eskew | Marshall, MO 65340 | $19,211 |
73 | Theo Staub LLC | Belleville, IL 62220 | $18,790 |
74 | L Sullivan Farms LLC | Slater, MO 65349 | $18,762 |
75 | Pemfarms Inc | Blackburn, MO 65321 | $18,719 |
76 | Wayne Brown | Gilliam, MO 65330 | $18,652 |
77 | Preston N Hisle | Miami, MO 65344 | $18,232 |
78 | John Patrick Samson | Marshall, MO 65340 | $18,171 |
79 | Frederick R Klinge III | Marshall, MO 65340 | $18,013 |
80 | Duane G Pomerenke | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $17,852 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”