Total Commodity Programs in Saline County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 3,894
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Saline County, Missouri totaled $254,081,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | James V Weaver | Marshall, MO 65340 | $701,979 |
62 | Terry Paul Edwards | Marshall, MO 65340 | $690,009 |
63 | Ina Frances Snoddy Dysart | Marshall, MO 65340 | $682,002 |
64 | Paul H Mizer | Marshall, MO 65340 | $680,768 |
65 | Mark Ray Petzoldt | Marshall, MO 65340 | $678,903 |
66 | Ralph Durham | Nelson, MO 65347 | $670,368 |
67 | Stephen A Graver | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $669,377 |
68 | Mark Kersten | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $661,072 |
69 | S & V Farms LLC | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $656,615 |
70 | Edwin Marvin Eaheart | Miami, MO 65344 | $655,757 |
71 | Frank Searcy Mccracken Jr | Marshall, MO 65340 | $651,646 |
72 | William Roger Kurtz | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $649,456 |
73 | John Patrick Samson | Marshall, MO 65340 | $648,098 |
74 | Ss Farms LLC | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $642,520 |
75 | Donald Wayne Buck | Marshall, MO 65340 | $614,838 |
76 | Walden E Chevalier Sr | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $613,033 |
77 | Gary Waller | Nelson, MO 65347 | $609,001 |
78 | Joe Thompson | Marshall, MO 65340 | $608,979 |
79 | Garold Lawrence Drake II | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $604,235 |
80 | James Edwin Bridges | Marshall, MO 65340 | $601,403 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”