Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Saline County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,482
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Saline County, Missouri totaled $489,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Kenneth Vogl | Slater, MO 65349 | $913 |
82 | Samuel Edward Yokley | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $912 |
83 | William Franklin Conner Jr | Marshall, MO 65340 | $899 |
84 | Beverly - Beverly J J Childers | Dawn, MO 64638 | $812 |
85 | Ina R Jenkins | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $811 |
86 | Sara Varner | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $811 |
87 | Mildred P Fisher | Miami, MO 65344 | $793 |
88 | George Robert Clemens | Marshall, MO 65340 | $767 |
89 | Russell L Sims | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $713 |
90 | Russell Alan Sims | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $688 |
91 | Mayme Sims | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $685 |
92 | Danny Lee Sims | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $665 |
93 | Robert M Edwards Jr | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $615 |
94 | Derek Davis LLC | Nelson, MO 65347 | $600 |
95 | Arlene Gieselman | Alma, MO 64001 | $594 |
96 | Douglas C Borgman | Marshall, MO 65340 | $592 |
97 | Vic Chevalier | Marshall, MO 65340 | $573 |
98 | Steven Markes | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $560 |
99 | J Henry Deal | Nelson, MO 65347 | $534 |
100 | Dorothy Nell Davis | Alma, MO 64001 | $518 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”