Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Saline County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 1,142
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Saline County, Missouri totaled $31,224,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Bart Vesser | Gilliam, MO 65330 | $61,824 |
142 | Hutcherson Farms L P | Marshall, MO 65340 | $61,673 |
143 | Barr Family LLC | Madison, WI 53717 | $59,897 |
144 | Steven K Perkins | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $59,459 |
145 | Arthur Thomas Peuster | Gilliam, MO 65330 | $59,282 |
146 | A A Farms Inc | Slater, MO 65349 | $59,220 |
147 | C & L Farms LLC | Gilliam, MO 65330 | $59,181 |
148 | Jeremy Boedeker | Marshall, MO 65340 | $59,179 |
149 | Bdm Farms LLC | Marshall, MO 65340 | $58,109 |
150 | Michael E Martin Farms LLC | Marshall, MO 65340 | $57,461 |
151 | Jonathan Borges | Marshall, MO 65340 | $56,880 |
152 | Jana Lynn Thompson | Marshall, MO 65340 | $55,782 |
153 | Missouri Crop Management Inc | Marshall, MO 65340 | $55,738 |
154 | Lee Farms Enterprises LLC | Slater, MO 65349 | $55,733 |
155 | Zackary Eugene King | Marshall, MO 65340 | $55,570 |
156 | J & M Farms Inc | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $55,460 |
157 | Frederick R Klinge III | Marshall, MO 65340 | $55,178 |
158 | Andrew D Phegley | Marshall, MO 65340 | $54,568 |
159 | Donald Boland | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $53,663 |
160 | Matthew Blake Franklin | Marshall, MO 65340 | $53,322 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”