Total Commodity Programs in Saline County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 1,100
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Saline County, Missouri totaled $6,511,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Vogel Equipment Inc | Marshall, MO 65340 | $13,460 |
142 | Dennis Herman Dieckhoff | Waverly, MO 64096 | $13,395 |
143 | Venable Farms Inc | Slater, MO 65349 | $13,249 |
144 | Richard Mark Fizer | Slater, MO 65349 | $13,204 |
145 | Josh Crank | Marshall, MO 65340 | $13,128 |
146 | H And M Thompson Farms Inc | Marshall, MO 65340 | $13,072 |
147 | Rodney Larue | Slater, MO 65349 | $13,056 |
148 | John L Mizer | Marshall, MO 65340 | $13,034 |
149 | Chester William Nolte | Blackburn, MO 65321 | $12,858 |
150 | J C S Harris Partnership | Slater, MO 65349 | $12,806 |
151 | Walden E Chevalier Sr | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $12,701 |
152 | Larry Morgan | Marshall, MO 65340 | $12,647 |
153 | Garry Durham | Gilliam, MO 65330 | $12,516 |
154 | Jeremy Boedeker | Marshall, MO 65340 | $12,443 |
155 | Louis A Eddy | Slater, MO 65349 | $12,439 |
156 | Gorrell Bros | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $12,208 |
157 | Stacy R Sims | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $12,015 |
158 | Dewey Wayne Sims | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $11,928 |
159 | Anthony Dean Blumhorst | Nelson, MO 65347 | $11,823 |
160 | David Hilary Boland | Marshall, MO 65340 | $11,630 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”