Total Conservation Programs in Saline County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 1,051
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Saline County, Missouri totaled $29,994,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Jane Stonner | Columbia, MO 65203 | $49,218 |
162 | Craig Poppinga | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $48,734 |
163 | Mike Viets | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $47,823 |
164 | Mr Darrell William Kusgen | Blackwater, MO 65322 | $47,751 |
165 | Martha Webster | Marshall, MO 65340 | $47,623 |
166 | Robert G Howell | Warsaw, MO 65355 | $47,601 |
167 | Robert A Snoddy | Miami, MO 65344 | $47,169 |
168 | E Benedick Samson Trust | Marshall, MO 65340 | $47,152 |
169 | C Gary Brown | Slater, MO 65349 | $46,935 |
170 | Zeysing Farms Inc | Marshall, MO 65340 | $46,850 |
171 | Terry Marvin Harris Estate | Kansas City, MO 64155 | $46,776 |
172 | Barbara L Nottmeier | Emma, MO 65327 | $46,626 |
173 | Thomas Bryan Hall III Revocable T | Shawnee Mission, KS 66208 | $46,515 |
174 | Matthew C Tennill | Marshall, MO 65340 | $45,304 |
175 | Harry James Backes | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $45,061 |
176 | William Herbert Stouffer | Marshall, MO 65340 | $44,958 |
177 | Lewis S Egan | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $44,543 |
178 | John E Driskell | Marshall, MO 65340 | $44,253 |
179 | E & E Farms LLC | Concordia, MO 64020 | $44,248 |
180 | George Daniel Weber | Marshall, MO 65340 | $43,665 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”