Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Saline County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,480
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Saline County, Missouri totaled $488,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Miles Farms Partnership | Marshall, MO 65340 | $5,095 |
22 | Edwin Marvin Eaheart | Miami, MO 65344 | $5,064 |
23 | Charles Farms Inc | Marshall, MO 65340 | $5,022 |
24 | A W Potts | Gilliam, MO 65330 | $5,015 |
25 | Jackie Haynie | Miami, MO 65344 | $5,000 |
26 | Boland & Fletcher | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $5,000 |
27 | Dale Wayne Hinnah | Nelson, MO 65347 | $4,376 |
28 | Janice Backes | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $3,878 |
29 | Drew Jackson | Marshall, MO 65340 | $3,693 |
30 | David Copeland | Miami, MO 65344 | $3,551 |
31 | Larry Eugene Gauldin | Columbia, MO 65203 | $3,339 |
32 | Charles Bagnell | Blackburn, MO 65321 | $3,323 |
33 | Trail Ridge Farms Inc | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $3,060 |
34 | Roy Murrell Willis | Miami, MO 65344 | $2,983 |
35 | Bernard Thornton Bargfrede | Blackburn, MO 65321 | $2,913 |
36 | David Sims | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $2,865 |
37 | Maryann Samson Rev Trust | Marshall, MO 65340 | $2,862 |
38 | Everett William Rehkop | Blackburn, MO 65321 | $2,791 |
39 | Lloyd Bentley | Marshall, MO 65340 | $2,525 |
40 | David Bentley | Marshall, MO 65340 | $2,515 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”