Farm Subsidy information
Saline County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Saline County, Missouri, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,401
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Saline County, Missouri totaled $32,712,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Wayne Brown Ent Inc | Gilliam, MO 65330 | $196,139 |
22 | Carey Paul Jones | Marshall, MO 65340 | $184,017 |
23 | Edward D Yeagle Jr | Marshall, MO 65340 | $182,819 |
24 | David Jay Brown | Marshall, MO 65340 | $175,369 |
25 | Zeysing Farms Inc | Marshall, MO 65340 | $174,107 |
26 | Fred Wright Farms LLC | Miami, MO 65344 | $170,209 |
27 | Swisher Farms Inc | Marshall, MO 65340 | $167,539 |
28 | Wildcat Family Farms Re, LLC | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $162,739 |
29 | Thiel Farms LLC | Marshall, MO 65340 | $160,118 |
30 | Bennett Kirchhoff | Blackburn, MO 65321 | $160,007 |
31 | Jana Lynn Thompson | Marshall, MO 65340 | $154,488 |
32 | Hoff Brothers Farms LLC | Marshall, MO 65340 | $146,477 |
33 | Drew Jackson | Marshall, MO 65340 | $146,361 |
34 | Mark Ray Petzoldt | Marshall, MO 65340 | $142,998 |
35 | Cary Brown | Gilliam, MO 65330 | $140,296 |
36 | Everett William Rehkop | Blackburn, MO 65321 | $137,317 |
37 | Justin L Heinzler | Marshall, MO 65340 | $135,986 |
38 | Garold Lawrence Drake II | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $134,945 |
39 | S & V Farms LLC | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $131,899 |
40 | Borgman Farms Inc | Marshall, MO 65340 | $131,525 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”