Farm Subsidy information
Saline County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Saline County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 698
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Saline County, Missouri totaled $11,065,000 in in 2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hemme Dairy LLC | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $106,004 |
| 2 | Marshall And Fenner | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $74,773 |
| 3 | Schuster Farms LLC | Blackwater, MO 65322 | $73,984 |
| 4 | Christopher Neil Jones | Marshall, MO 65340 | $72,252 |
| 5 | Mull Farms, Incorporated | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $69,508 |
| 6 | Edward D Yeagle Jr | Marshall, MO 65340 | $59,471 |
| 7 | Miles Farms Partnership | Marshall, MO 65340 | $55,875 |
| 8 | Emmr LLC | Concordia, MO 64020 | $54,704 |
| 9 | Drew Jackson | Marshall, MO 65340 | $53,086 |
| 10 | David Jay Brown | Marshall, MO 65340 | $48,951 |
| 11 | Ginger G Mcgraw | Marshall, MO 65340 | $48,781 |
| 12 | Larry Charles Scott | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $48,751 |
| 13 | John Paul Mcgraw | Marshall, MO 65340 | $46,223 |
| 14 | John C Vogelsmeier | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $45,584 |
| 15 | Christy Farms LLC | Nelson, MO 65347 | $41,074 |
| 16 | Joshua Vance Lovercamp | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $36,873 |
| 17 | Jim Ed Peel | Slater, MO 65349 | $36,026 |
| 18 | William Roger Kurtz | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $34,602 |
| 19 | Evan C Summers | Gilliam, MO 65330 | $31,589 |
| 20 | Malter Farms LLC | Marshall, MO 65340 | $31,301 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
