Direct Payment Program in Saline County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,419
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Saline County, Missouri totaled $53,797,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Marshall Ag Services Inc | Marshall, MO 65340 | $192,713 |
42 | Pemfarms Inc | Blackburn, MO 65321 | $192,506 |
43 | Robert E Malan | Marshall, MO 65340 | $190,866 |
44 | Edward D Yeagle Jr | Marshall, MO 65340 | $186,390 |
45 | Donna Jean Rehkop | Blackburn, MO 65321 | $184,909 |
46 | James N Famuliner | Carrollton, MO 64633 | $177,611 |
47 | Schuster Farms LLC | Blackwater, MO 65322 | $175,788 |
48 | Bruce Allen Livengood | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $173,513 |
49 | Raymond And Mary Boland Trust Uta Dtd 02/25/1999 | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $173,195 |
50 | Matthew David Kueker | Marshall, MO 65340 | $172,568 |
51 | J & M Farms Inc | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $169,797 |
52 | S & V Farms LLC | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $169,179 |
53 | Christy Farms LLC | Nelson, MO 65347 | $168,553 |
54 | E & E Farms LLC | Concordia, MO 64020 | $167,857 |
55 | Jim Ed Peel | Slater, MO 65349 | $167,437 |
56 | Wayne Brown | Gilliam, MO 65330 | $166,277 |
57 | Joseph Emmett Barr | Marshall, MO 65340 | $164,237 |
58 | Mark Kersten | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $164,146 |
59 | C Gary Brown | Slater, MO 65349 | $163,828 |
60 | Lynn C Evans Revocable Trust | Marshall, MO 65340 | $163,125 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”