Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Saline County, Missouri, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 555
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Saline County, Missouri totaled $531,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Richard B Kiehl | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $4,366 |
22 | David Copeland | Miami, MO 65344 | $4,273 |
23 | Frank Searcy Mccracken Jr | Marshall, MO 65340 | $4,208 |
24 | M And T Thompson Farms Inc | Marshall, MO 65340 | $4,177 |
25 | J J Thompson Farms Inc | Marshall, MO 65340 | $4,177 |
26 | Alan Clements | Miami, MO 65344 | $4,083 |
27 | Exchange Bank Of Missouri ** | Fayette, MO 65248 | $3,831 |
28 | Kruger Farms LLC | Slater, MO 65349 | $3,761 |
29 | Loren Windmeyer | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $3,737 |
30 | Robert E Malan | Marshall, MO 65340 | $3,736 |
31 | Ss Farms LLC | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $3,669 |
32 | Eaheart Family Partnershiip L P | Miami, MO 65344 | $3,619 |
33 | Daniel Allen Leimkuehler | Marshall, MO 65340 | $3,605 |
34 | Marshall Family Farm Limited Partnership | Marshall, MO 65340 | $3,532 |
35 | Jeffrey Thomas Mccracken | Marshall, MO 65340 | $3,447 |
36 | H And M Thompson Farms Inc | Marshall, MO 65340 | $3,430 |
37 | Jerome Boedeker | Marshall, MO 65340 | $3,343 |
38 | South Fork Farms Inc | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $3,327 |
39 | Venable Farms Inc | Slater, MO 65349 | $3,305 |
40 | Chester William Nolte | Blackburn, MO 65321 | $3,175 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”