Farm Subsidy information
Schuyler County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Schuyler County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 390
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Schuyler County, Missouri totaled $5,510,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Darrell Gooden | Lancaster, MO 63548 | $19,471 |
62 | Jackson Brothers Ranch LLC | Downing, MO 63536 | $19,097 |
63 | Steve Shive | Saint Peters, MO 63376 | $18,956 |
64 | Jeff Bennett | Downing, MO 63536 | $18,204 |
65 | Edward Berry | Glenwood, MO 63541 | $17,851 |
66 | Jerry Lynn Scurlock | Downing, MO 63536 | $17,781 |
67 | Drew Bruner | Queen City, MO 63561 | $17,698 |
68 | James N Tennyson Living Trust | St Peters, MO 63376 | $16,944 |
69 | Shelton R Zeiset | Queen City, MO 63561 | $16,676 |
70 | Floyd Wilcox | Lancaster, MO 63548 | $16,339 |
71 | Mark Bushnell | Queen City, MO 63561 | $16,220 |
72 | Nick Aeschliman | Lancaster, MO 63548 | $15,983 |
73 | Titus Delynn Martin | Glenwood, MO 63541 | $15,739 |
74 | Steven Miller | Downing, MO 63536 | $15,654 |
75 | Terry Wheeler | Downing, MO 63536 | $15,527 |
76 | Curtis Talbert | Greentop, MO 63546 | $15,488 |
77 | James D Starbuck | Queen City, MO 63561 | $15,435 |
78 | Jake Groseclose | Lancaster, MO 63548 | $15,360 |
79 | Walter L Byrn And Donna L Byrn Family Trust | Greentop, MO 63546 | $15,176 |
80 | Terence S Poe | Downing, MO 63536 | $14,990 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”