Conservation Reserve Program in Schuyler County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 127
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Schuyler County, Missouri totaled $856,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Daniel Starbuck | Plattsmouth, NE 68048 | $3,867 |
62 | Cynthia Stump | Lancaster, MO 63548 | $3,767 |
63 | Benjamin Kelsey | Lancaster, MO 63548 | $3,685 |
64 | Audrey Broom-bartlett | Mexico, MO 65265 | $3,685 |
65 | Kollar Farms Inc | Kirksville, MO 63501 | $3,567 |
66 | Jdh-23 LLC | Swisher, IA 52338 | $3,529 |
67 | Jim Mcnabb | Queen City, MO 63561 | $3,422 |
68 | Scott Sides | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $3,328 |
69 | Thomas E Konke | Downing, MO 63536 | $3,268 |
70 | Elmer B Mcelhinney | Queen City, MO 63561 | $3,210 |
71 | Paul Prough | Queen City, MO 63561 | $3,169 |
72 | Van Meter Farms LLC | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $3,088 |
73 | Vernon Carroll | Downing, MO 63536 | $2,960 |
74 | Janice Little | O Fallon, MO 63368 | $2,910 |
75 | Craig Nafziger | Stanford, IL 61774 | $2,806 |
76 | Patricia Pierce | Greentop, MO 63546 | $2,770 |
77 | Pamela Propst | Greentop, MO 63546 | $2,704 |
78 | Nelson Tallman | Queen City, MO 63561 | $2,621 |
79 | Jeff B Roberts | Brookfield, MO 64628 | $2,505 |
80 | Lynne Saunders | Lancaster, MO 63548 | $2,489 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”