Conservation Reserve Program in Schuyler County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 127
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Schuyler County, Missouri totaled $856,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Chad Halverson | Grimes, IA 50111 | $2,435 |
82 | David Morre | Saint Charles, MO 63304 | $2,415 |
83 | Ronald Morre | Hazelwood, MO 63042 | $2,415 |
84 | Karen Lewis | Queen City, MO 63561 | $2,373 |
85 | Wm Nova Johnson | Queen City, MO 63561 | $2,354 |
86 | , | $2,309 | |
87 | Dennis Sidwell | Kirksville, MO 63501 | $2,261 |
88 | David Sidwell | Queen City, MO 63561 | $2,261 |
89 | Joshua Bill Vincent | Greentop, MO 63546 | $2,228 |
90 | Jeff Lindquist | Greentop, MO 63546 | $2,124 |
91 | Stephen Willcox | Lancaster, MO 63548 | $2,022 |
92 | Kv Investment Properties LLC | Kirksville, MO 63501 | $2,010 |
93 | Kevin L Klug | Saint Louis, MO 63123 | $1,970 |
94 | Toni Mattson | Marietta, GA 30066 | $1,748 |
95 | Craig Sizemore | Overland Park, KS 66213 | $1,651 |
96 | Ryan Vandillen | Fenton, MO 63026 | $1,616 |
97 | Robert C Stice | Downing, MO 63536 | $1,602 |
98 | Albert Ashmead | Lancaster, MO 63548 | $1,596 |
99 | Herbert E Austin | Queen City, MO 63561 | $1,504 |
100 | Mccartney Land & Cattle Co | Queen City, MO 63561 | $1,470 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”