Conservation Reserve Program in Schuyler County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 672
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Schuyler County, Missouri totaled $34,202,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Roger Wilson | Lancaster, MO 63548 | $50,625 |
162 | Susan Riegle | Orting, WA 98360 | $50,535 |
163 | Barbara Luby | Fort Worth, TX 76112 | $50,211 |
164 | Delores J Mcelroy | Queen City, MO 63561 | $49,870 |
165 | Steven Hermann | Ste Genevieve, MO 63670 | $48,869 |
166 | Wk2d Investments LLC | Sainte Genevieve, MO 63670 | $48,828 |
167 | Ferdig Farm Inc | Lancaster, MO 63548 | $46,442 |
168 | Michael J Schulze | Washington, MO 63090 | $46,384 |
169 | Mikel Roberts | Lancaster, MO 63548 | $46,157 |
170 | Karla M West | Moulton, IA 52572 | $45,806 |
171 | Shirley Alexander | Queen City, MO 63561 | $45,696 |
172 | Albert Ashmead | Lancaster, MO 63548 | $45,353 |
173 | Jack Farnsworth | Downing, MO 63536 | $45,351 |
174 | Richard C Miller Trust | Littleton, CO 80123 | $45,079 |
175 | Pauline Peterson | Greentop, MO 63546 | $44,115 |
176 | Dale Brubaker | Lancaster, MO 63548 | $43,956 |
177 | Robert L Kelsey | Greentop, MO 63546 | $43,892 |
178 | Howard Sidwell | Queen City, MO 63561 | $43,637 |
179 | Greg Pantry | Lancaster, MO 63548 | $43,215 |
180 | Hazel Marie Shively | Bloomfield, IA 52537 | $43,134 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”