Total Emergency Relief Program in Scott County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 64
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Scott County, Missouri totaled $640,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Eric M Seiler | Scott City, MO 63780 | $3,817 |
42 | Schwartz Brothers Inc | Scott City, MO 63780 | $3,645 |
43 | Vincent Hulshof | Benton, MO 63736 | $3,638 |
44 | M G Farms LLC | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $3,533 |
45 | John L Wilson Jr | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $2,944 |
46 | Nesler Farms Holdings LLC | Mayfield, KY 42066 | $2,611 |
47 | Vetter Ci Farms LLC | Benton, MO 63736 | $2,577 |
48 | Blake Wade | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $2,529 |
49 | Thomas Rand Brazel | Charleston, MO 63834 | $2,024 |
50 | Jones Family Farms | Oran, MO 63771 | $2,010 |
51 | Mum Cattle Company | Scott City, MO 63780 | $1,442 |
52 | Triple D Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,165 |
53 | Kenneth Michael Burger Burger Rv Trust U/a/d Ausgu | Scott City, MO 63780 | $1,073 |
54 | Essner Brothers Farms | Benton, MO 63736 | $968 |
55 | Andrew Essner | Benton, MO 63736 | $963 |
56 | Timothy Essner | Benton, MO 63736 | $960 |
57 | Norman S Essner | Scott City, MO 63780 | $465 |
58 | Ralph Pattengill Farms Inc | Springfield, VA 22152 | $403 |
59 | Currie And Fitzgerald Heirs | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $325 |
60 | Estate Of C D Springs | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $214 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”