Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Scott County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 140
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Scott County, Missouri totaled $338,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Kenneth W Anderson | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,217 |
62 | Devin James | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,148 |
63 | Seyer Farms | Oran, MO 63771 | $1,119 |
64 | Evans Ag Supply LLC | Scott City, MO 63780 | $1,082 |
65 | Delta Limited Partnership | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,076 |
66 | Ecm Farm 3 | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,004 |
67 | Stephen A Williams Revocable Trust | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,000 |
68 | Kenneth Michael Burger Burger Rv Trust U/a/d Ausgu | Scott City, MO 63780 | $965 |
69 | Ridgetop Farms LLC | Scott City, MO 63780 | $933 |
70 | Donald Pobst Farms Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $852 |
71 | John Harper Dba Harper Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $836 |
72 | Helfrich Brothers Farm | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $804 |
73 | Jane And Larue Campbell Partnership | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $772 |
74 | David Dolan | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $737 |
75 | Michael Marshall | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $737 |
76 | A R Curtis Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $731 |
77 | Edward Eugene Dement | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $674 |
78 | Kaye Ellen Dement | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $674 |
79 | Margaret M Ford | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $668 |
80 | Seiler Land Co Inc | Benton, MO 63736 | $652 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”