Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Scott County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 934
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Scott County, Missouri totaled $20,301,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Chris Kielhofner Farms | Oran, MO 63771 | $85,816 |
62 | Kevin Bollinger | Benton, MO 63736 | $85,165 |
63 | Seiler Land Co Inc | Benton, MO 63736 | $83,295 |
64 | Gage Farms | Scott City, MO 63780 | $82,726 |
65 | Whitten & Whitten Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $82,219 |
66 | Jerry Dambach | Benton, MO 63736 | $82,107 |
67 | Curry Farm Partnership | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $81,408 |
68 | Jon Vince Draper | Benton, MO 63736 | $80,447 |
69 | Engram Farms Family Lp | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $78,576 |
70 | Kathy Sue Shramek | Williamsburg, MO 63388 | $78,435 |
71 | Brian Michael Ray | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $77,127 |
72 | United Ridge Farms Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $76,825 |
73 | Randy Enderle | Oran, MO 63771 | $76,489 |
74 | Evans Ag Supply LLC | Scott City, MO 63780 | $75,465 |
75 | Farm Credit Southeast Missouri ** | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $73,479 |
76 | Vetter Ci Farms LLC | Benton, MO 63736 | $73,422 |
77 | Aaron Alan Pobst | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $71,345 |
78 | B & L Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $71,219 |
79 | Gary W Heuring | Scott City, MO 63780 | $70,282 |
80 | Ryan Britton Farms LLC | Villa Ridge, IL 62996 | $69,928 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”