Conservation Reserve Program in Scott County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 187
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Scott County, Missouri totaled $1,135,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jon M Heuring | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $5,604 |
62 | Father Thomas P Kiefer | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $5,595 |
63 | Michael Ray | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $5,265 |
64 | Hrc Farms LLC | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $5,205 |
65 | Bernard J Debrock | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $5,170 |
66 | Richard Roth | Scott City, MO 63780 | $4,924 |
67 | Oliver W. Kirkpatrick Living Trust | Charleston, MO 63834 | $4,787 |
68 | Betty Arline Stuckey Trust | Benton, MO 63736 | $4,785 |
69 | Robert Jeffery Householder | Benton, MO 63736 | $4,585 |
70 | Steve Minner Farms | Oran, MO 63771 | $4,512 |
71 | L Burke Dodson - Burke And Cherie Dodson Trust | Charleston, MO 63834 | $4,458 |
72 | Carl Schott Farms Inc | Oran, MO 63771 | $4,271 |
73 | Steve Hof | Benton, MO 63736 | $4,234 |
74 | Ridgetop Farms LLC | Scott City, MO 63780 | $4,206 |
75 | Floyd J Klipfel | Oran, MO 63771 | $4,135 |
76 | Darrell Klipfel | Oran, MO 63771 | $4,135 |
77 | Zachary G Essner | Scott City, MO 63780 | $4,084 |
78 | Donna Thompson | Benton, MO 63736 | $4,046 |
79 | Dame Land Co | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $4,034 |
80 | Blodgett LLC | Matthews, MO 63867 | $3,978 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”