Total Conservation Programs in Scott County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 186
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Scott County, Missouri totaled $1,317,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Darrell Klipfel | Oran, MO 63771 | $4,135 |
82 | Seyer Farms | Oran, MO 63771 | $4,077 |
83 | Frederick J Glastetter & Mary Beth Glastetter Revo | Oran, MO 63771 | $4,061 |
84 | Steve Johnson Farm | Vanduser, MO 63784 | $4,054 |
85 | Donna Thompson | Benton, MO 63736 | $4,046 |
86 | Dame Land Co | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $4,034 |
87 | Wkh Land Management LLC | Benton, MO 63736 | $3,815 |
88 | Douglas Gosche | Oran, MO 63771 | $3,761 |
89 | Don Scherer | Oran, MO 63771 | $3,761 |
90 | Crumpecker Farms LLC | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $3,743 |
91 | Douglas W Sikes | Oran, MO 63771 | $3,678 |
92 | S & S Ag Properties LLC | Scott City, MO 63780 | $3,658 |
93 | Concord Farms Inc | Charleston, MO 63834 | $3,640 |
94 | Mar Farms LLC | Saint Louis, MO 63141 | $3,593 |
95 | Charles M Cossou | Scott City, MO 63780 | $3,584 |
96 | Christopher Ray Venable | Scott City, MO 63780 | $3,558 |
97 | David Bollinger | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $3,451 |
98 | Todt Family Farm LLC | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $3,340 |
99 | , | $3,108 | |
100 | Stubblefield Farm | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $3,086 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”