Production Flexibility Program in Scott County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,151
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Scott County, Missouri totaled $22,561,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Joseph William Sander | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $65,051 |
102 | Tom Hulshof | Benton, MO 63736 | $64,309 |
103 | Kevin Edwards | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $63,714 |
104 | Thomas S Byrd | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $63,545 |
105 | Martin John Eftink | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $63,250 |
106 | Sandra L Sitzes - Sitzes Farms LLC | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $63,014 |
107 | Vincent Dirnberger | Oran, MO 63771 | $61,582 |
108 | Kenneth J Westrich | Scott City, MO 63780 | $61,438 |
109 | Kesler Farms | Oran, MO 63771 | $60,317 |
110 | Christopher D Matthews | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $58,830 |
111 | Jarvis Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $57,184 |
112 | Vernon Vetter | Benton, MO 63736 | $57,022 |
113 | Jim Lovett | Charleston, MO 63834 | $56,871 |
114 | Jon Vince Draper | Benton, MO 63736 | $56,543 |
115 | Gage Bros | Charleston, MO 63834 | $56,342 |
116 | David Lape | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $55,699 |
117 | Gary W Heuring | Scott City, MO 63780 | $55,495 |
118 | Schwartz Brothers Inc | Scott City, MO 63780 | $54,503 |
119 | Robert Paul Graviett | Oran, MO 63771 | $54,216 |
120 | Daniel E Dumey Sr | Benton, MO 63736 | $54,063 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”