Total Conservation Programs in Scott County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 540
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Scott County, Missouri totaled $20,098,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Charles Klueppel Revocable Trust | Benton, MO 63736 | $30,097 |
162 | John A Felter | Benton, MO 63736 | $30,027 |
163 | Charles M Moore Revocable Trust | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $30,005 |
164 | Rose Ann Scherer | Benton, MO 63736 | $29,613 |
165 | Monty Keesee | Scott City, MO 63780 | $29,608 |
166 | Michael G Bollinger | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $29,559 |
167 | Doris J Walter | Oran, MO 63771 | $29,078 |
168 | Kenneth Roy Householder | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $28,985 |
169 | Triple S Farms | Benton, MO 63736 | $28,656 |
170 | Martin Grain Co Inc | Bernie, MO 63822 | $28,620 |
171 | Floyd Delbert Stallings-floyd D Stallings Living T | Charleston, MO 63834 | $28,295 |
172 | Sheila B Whaley | Alcoa, TN 37701 | $28,104 |
173 | Sallie B Goodin Living Trust | Charleston, MO 63834 | $28,104 |
174 | Kenneth Legrand | Scott City, MO 63780 | $27,810 |
175 | Jon Vince Draper | Benton, MO 63736 | $27,544 |
176 | William E Walker III | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $27,175 |
177 | Virginia I Essner | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $26,493 |
178 | Seyer Farms | Oran, MO 63771 | $25,931 |
179 | Glenn Nothdurft | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $25,076 |
180 | Mark E Friga | Chaffee, MO 63740 | $25,065 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”