Total Disaster Programs in Scott County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 729
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Scott County, Missouri totaled $8,396,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Heartland Potato Farm | Benton, MO 63736 | $428,635 |
2 | Hopper & Hopper | Scott City, MO 63780 | $283,608 |
3 | Burger Planting Co | Oran, MO 63771 | $215,187 |
4 | Patrick Hulshof Farms | Benton, MO 63736 | $191,086 |
5 | Brandon Gale Stewart | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $181,404 |
6 | Wolfhole Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $141,824 |
7 | John Byrd Farms Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $136,052 |
8 | Gilpin Farms Llp | Scott City, MO 63780 | $126,974 |
9 | Alice Olson | Saint Louis, MO 63105 | $126,214 |
10 | Colin Dean Stewart | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $123,190 |
11 | Faron Blaine Stewart | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $119,012 |
12 | Brazel Land & Timber LLC | Charleston, MO 63834 | $118,271 |
13 | David Anthony Landewee | Scott City, MO 63780 | $110,665 |
14 | Oneal P Wimberley Jr | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $106,707 |
15 | Cameron F Beggs | Benton, MO 63736 | $100,207 |
16 | Burger Farms & Ranches LLC | Scott City, MO 63780 | $100,104 |
17 | Hubbert Farms | Benton, MO 63736 | $98,372 |
18 | Cole Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $97,784 |
19 | Urhahn Farms | Benton, MO 63736 | $95,554 |
20 | Kenneth Michael Burger Burger Rv Trust U/a/d Ausgu | Scott City, MO 63780 | $89,958 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>