Total Conservation Programs in Shannon County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 67
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Shannon County, Missouri totaled $262,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Judy Ann Smith | Summersville, MO 65571 | $3,281 |
22 | Harold D Young | Summersville, MO 65571 | $3,268 |
23 | Donald Ray Thomas Jr | Birch Tree, MO 65438 | $3,258 |
24 | Kenneth Mcnew | Summersville, MO 65571 | $3,225 |
25 | Byrne Enterprises, Inc. | Eminence, MO 65466 | $3,191 |
26 | James B Edwards | Mountain View, MO 65548 | $3,138 |
27 | Lloyd S Detwiler | Birch Tree, MO 65438 | $3,083 |
28 | Oscar D Smotherman | Birch Tree, MO 65438 | $3,001 |
29 | James Self | Birch Tree, MO 65438 | $2,708 |
30 | Bryan Reese | Mountain View, MO 65548 | $2,635 |
31 | John Burt | Kodiak, AK 99615 | $2,565 |
32 | Fred Mattison | Summersville, MO 65571 | $2,448 |
33 | Clinton Butter Reeves | Birch Tree, MO 65438 | $2,395 |
34 | Myles Guffey | Mountain View, MO 65548 | $2,340 |
35 | Gerald Derryberry | Birch Tree, MO 65438 | $2,186 |
36 | Ralph D Smith | Birch Tree, MO 65438 | $2,154 |
37 | John Latecki | Mountain View, MO 65548 | $2,004 |
38 | Wayne Young | Summersville, MO 65571 | $1,861 |
39 | Sho Me Farms Inc | Birch Tree, MO 65438 | $1,835 |
40 | Wayne E Smith | Summersville, MO 65571 | $1,835 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”