Farm Subsidy information
Shelby County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Shelby County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 395
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Shelby County, Missouri totaled $11,082,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Tom Shively | Shelbyville, MO 63469 | $16,328 |
62 | Keith Douglas | Emden, MO 63439 | $15,971 |
63 | Mark Alan Copenhaver | Shelbyville, MO 63469 | $15,877 |
64 | Jesse K Schwanke | Leonard, MO 63451 | $15,674 |
65 | George Melvin Wilt | Shelbyville, MO 63469 | $15,349 |
66 | Lee Fletcher Wood | Clarence, MO 63437 | $15,140 |
67 | Loren Edward Harder | Leonard, MO 63451 | $14,986 |
68 | Paul Joseph Jarboe | Clarence, MO 63437 | $14,922 |
69 | Joe Hickman | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $14,862 |
70 | Edward Joseph Ratliff | Shelbyville, MO 63469 | $14,798 |
71 | Werr Farms Inc | Shelbyville, MO 63469 | $14,735 |
72 | Thomas Matthew Gill | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $14,534 |
73 | Gerald L Shuck | Hunnewell, MO 63443 | $14,474 |
74 | Michael Wayne Novinger | Shelbyville, MO 63469 | $14,465 |
75 | John A Cunningham | Scottsdale, AZ 85262 | $14,284 |
76 | Gaye Lei Brown | Parkville, MO 64152 | $14,221 |
77 | Charles Brent Foreman | Anabel, MO 63431 | $14,180 |
78 | Mark Steven Schild | Dardenne Prairie, MO 63368 | $13,920 |
79 | Three A Farms LLC | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $13,891 |
80 | Fabius River Farms LLC | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $13,816 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”