Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments in Shelby County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 123
Recipients of Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments from farms in Shelby County, Missouri totaled $446,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Michaele Marie Novinger | Shelbyville, MO 63469 | $794 |
82 | Mark Steven Schild | Dardenne Prairie, MO 63368 | $704 |
83 | Bradd Farms Inc | Mahomet, IL 61853 | $615 |
84 | Charles Brent Foreman | Anabel, MO 63431 | $589 |
85 | Thomas Matthew Gill | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $576 |
86 | Michael Randolph Houston | Holliday, MO 65258 | $567 |
87 | Jeffery L Shuck | Hunnewell, MO 63443 | $561 |
88 | Latchford Family Farms, LLC | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $560 |
89 | Richard Snider | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $548 |
90 | Carl Dean Pence | Kirkwood, MO 63122 | $493 |
91 | Stacy Harder | Edina, MO 63537 | $493 |
92 | Larry Joseph Mason | Shelbyville, MO 63469 | $476 |
93 | Randall Reed Hunolt | Bethel, MO 63434 | $473 |
94 | Rory Lee Tracy | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $404 |
95 | Jacob Moon | Bethel, MO 63434 | $400 |
96 | Charlotte R Buckman Revocable Trust | Quincy, IL 62305 | $399 |
97 | Courtney Dane Culler | Shelbyville, MO 63469 | $380 |
98 | Prange Farms LLC | Shelbyville, MO 63469 | $370 |
99 | Christopher Andrew Gerrish | Columbia, MO 65203 | $345 |
100 | Jason Michael Daniel | Leonard, MO 63451 | $345 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”