Total Conservation Programs in Shelby County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 309
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Shelby County, Missouri totaled $1,687,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Robert E Nelke Jr | Florissant, MO 63033 | $7,090 |
82 | Randall Little | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $6,844 |
83 | Flora F Bridgman | Bethel, MO 63434 | $6,780 |
84 | Trudy A Collins-cervantes | Albuquerque, NM 87112 | $6,612 |
85 | James Edward Resa | Leonard, MO 63451 | $6,502 |
86 | Kenneth J Fattmann Living Trust | Saint Peters, MO 63376 | $6,421 |
87 | Betty J Leap | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $6,394 |
88 | Stiefel Joint Living Trust | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $6,347 |
89 | John A Behr | Augusta, MO 63332 | $6,338 |
90 | Jay R Boleach | Saint Peters, MO 63376 | $6,304 |
91 | J B Investment Co | Wentzville, MO 63385 | $6,164 |
92 | Jason Randall Plunkett | Philadelphia, MO 63463 | $6,119 |
93 | Justyn T Plunkett | Palmyra, MO 63461 | $6,119 |
94 | Harold Jones | Bethel, MO 63434 | $6,105 |
95 | Brandon Runyon | Leonard, MO 63451 | $5,965 |
96 | Steven L Mcclallen-steven L Mcclallen Rev Tr | Eureka, IL 61530 | $5,925 |
97 | Trails End Farms LLC | New London, MO 63459 | $5,650 |
98 | Adams & Adams LLC | Lentner, MO 63450 | $5,527 |
99 | Michael S Maupin | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $5,526 |
100 | Vanhouten Family Trust | Clarence, MO 63437 | $5,423 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”