Farm Subsidy information
Shelby County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Shelby County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 772
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Shelby County, Missouri totaled $11,595,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | James Dennis Gaines | Shelbyville, MO 63469 | $16,086 |
102 | Brent Wood | Clarence, MO 63437 | $16,012 |
103 | Matthew Charles Beach | Leonard, MO 63451 | $15,978 |
104 | Three A Farms LLC | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $15,941 |
105 | Charles F Kirby Jr | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $15,745 |
106 | Jerry Mchenry Beckley | Clarence, MO 63437 | $15,724 |
107 | Latchford Family Farms, LLC | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $15,624 |
108 | Timothy Joel Farmer | Clarence, MO 63437 | $15,614 |
109 | Richard Gene Chinn | Clarence, MO 63437 | $15,610 |
110 | Kerry P Mccarty | Clarence, MO 63437 | $15,581 |
111 | Timothy A Chinn | Clarence, MO 63437 | $15,509 |
112 | Thomas E Chinn | Clarence, MO 63437 | $15,385 |
113 | Rory Lee Tracy | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $15,328 |
114 | Bill Mayes | Lentner, MO 63450 | $15,179 |
115 | Ed M Coe | Shelbyville, MO 63469 | $15,164 |
116 | Shana-slt Farming, LLC Lou Threlkeld | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $15,008 |
117 | Carl Dean Pence | Kirkwood, MO 63122 | $14,929 |
118 | John A Cunningham | Scottsdale, AZ 85262 | $14,284 |
119 | Dennis Culler | Shelbyville, MO 63469 | $14,233 |
120 | Lloyd Mark Jackson | Shelbyville, MO 63469 | $14,192 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”