Farm Subsidy information
Shelby County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Shelby County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 772
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Shelby County, Missouri totaled $11,595,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Keith Douglas | Emden, MO 63439 | $12,538 |
142 | Randall Lamar Boyles | Colona, IL 61241 | $12,316 |
143 | William Louis Griffith Estate | Saint Petersburg, FL 33703 | $12,195 |
144 | Joshlin Ray Yoder | Leonard, MO 63451 | $12,106 |
145 | Joe Hickman | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $12,093 |
146 | John A Hickman Revocable Trust | Saint Joseph, MO 64506 | $12,093 |
147 | Gaye Lei Brown | Parkville, MO 64152 | $12,067 |
148 | Greg Copenhaver | Shelbyville, MO 63469 | $12,060 |
149 | Stephen Allyn Boling | Lentner, MO 63450 | $12,041 |
150 | W Levi Keller | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $12,041 |
151 | Phillip Gaines | Byrnes Mill, MO 63051 | $12,001 |
152 | Kay Keaton Revocable Living Trust | Weldon Spring, MO 63304 | $11,935 |
153 | John T Werr | Shelbyville, MO 63469 | $11,794 |
154 | Aaron Gaines | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $11,684 |
155 | Colton Reed Vonthun | Shelbyville, MO 63469 | $11,647 |
156 | Jesse K Schwanke | Leonard, MO 63451 | $11,614 |
157 | Mccarty Farm Investments LLC | Columbia, MO 65203 | $11,572 |
158 | Nellie L Latchford | Shelbina, MO 63468 | $11,140 |
159 | Tyler Ray Otto | Shelbyville, MO 63469 | $11,052 |
160 | Adam Dale Gander | Shelbyville, MO 63469 | $11,018 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”