Conservation Reserve Program in Shelby County, Missouri, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 850

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Shelby County, Missouri totaled $33,944,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2021
21Emery Eugene GerrishShelbina, MO 63468$228,911
22Belt Fur Wool & Seed CoLeonard, MO 63451$227,154
23Hickman Family TrustShelbina, MO 63468$219,647
24Harold DudleyFlorissant, MO 63031$218,789
25Borgman Family Farms LpSaint Peters, MO 63376$216,707
26Mary Lou FranklinShelbina, MO 63468$208,664
27Archie F HaubrockShelbina, MO 63468$207,997
28Robert L VickersShelbina, MO 63468$197,219
29Caw 2008 Revocable TrustColumbia, MO 65203$196,649
30Nettie B Thrasher Irrevocable TrustClarence, MO 63437$193,895
31Thomas Kenny BichselLeonard, MO 63451$185,208
32Lawrence & Catherine Wiseman Family TrustJefferson City, MO 65101$184,073
33Lloyd Hickman Survivor's TrustShelbina, MO 63468$183,953
34Glen Dean HendersonEmden, MO 63439$178,210
35Jesse C Burton Revocable TrustShelbyville, MO 63469$177,525
36Dale WinnMetamora, IL 61548$176,329
37Alvin Larry McconnellLewistown, MO 63452$175,466
38Jeff RaymerShelbyville, MO 63469$174,485
39John A Hickman Revocable TrustSaint Joseph, MO 64506$173,115
40Elizabeth FlemingMacon, MO 63552$166,854

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag