Farm Subsidy information
Stoddard County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Stoddard County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 565
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Stoddard County, Missouri totaled $18,996,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mcgarity Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $63,634 |
22 | N E Z Inc | Bell City, MO 63735 | $61,954 |
23 | Lemmons Brothers Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $61,151 |
24 | Janell Marie Stewart | Wappapello, MO 63966 | $58,482 |
25 | Nebco Inc | Bell City, MO 63735 | $56,954 |
26 | Robert Lee King, II | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $55,409 |
27 | Melina Gwen Wheeler | Grayridge, MO 63850 | $54,769 |
28 | Laurie Diane Wheeler | Grayridge, MO 63850 | $54,769 |
29 | Bell Family Partnership | Van Buren, MO 63965 | $54,736 |
30 | Rachel Jones | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $53,250 |
31 | Shane D Garner | Advance, MO 63730 | $52,446 |
32 | Scott Moore Farms | Dudley, MO 63936 | $49,396 |
33 | David Keith Wheeler | Grayridge, MO 63850 | $49,172 |
34 | James Scott Wheeler | Grayridge, MO 63850 | $49,172 |
35 | Wilber Bradford Wheeler | Grayridge, MO 63850 | $49,172 |
36 | Ccg Farms Incorporated | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $48,427 |
37 | Jppl Inc | Bell City, MO 63735 | $46,935 |
38 | Michael & Cynthia Bell Farms | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $44,399 |
39 | Hancock Family Farms LLC | Fisk, MO 63940 | $44,254 |
40 | Donald L Cato Farms | Advance, MO 63730 | $43,483 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”