Commodity Certificates in Stoddard County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 242
Recipients of Commodity Certificates from farms in Stoddard County, Missouri totaled $23,760,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Commodity Certificates 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jeffrey Allen Burleson | Dexter, MO 63841 | $134,134 |
42 | Robert Russell Dawson | Bernie, MO 63822 | $129,414 |
43 | James Hampton Farms | Dexter, MO 63841 | $129,142 |
44 | Kenneth Wayne Parris | Dexter, MO 63841 | $129,128 |
45 | Ulen Inc | Dexter, MO 63841 | $126,458 |
46 | Jeremy Loyd Conner | Essex, MO 63846 | $123,037 |
47 | Burleson Farms Inc | Dexter, MO 63841 | $114,693 |
48 | Morgan & Below Farms LLC | Parma, MO 63870 | $113,981 |
49 | Haley Family Farms | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $113,489 |
50 | Yancey Gene Hardin | Catron, MO 63833 | $113,099 |
51 | B Dawson Planting Co Inactive | Dexter, MO 63841 | $105,100 |
52 | Ralph Russell Mouser | Dexter, MO 63841 | $97,452 |
53 | Keasler Farms Inc | Parma, MO 63870 | $96,445 |
54 | Delta Pine Land Co Lp | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $95,233 |
55 | Wheeler Brothers Inc | Grayridge, MO 63850 | $94,783 |
56 | Johnnie Myles Rutledge | Parma, MO 63870 | $92,375 |
57 | Thelma Arlene Blunt | Essex, MO 63846 | $89,522 |
58 | Keith Mayberry Farms | Essex, MO 63846 | $89,451 |
59 | Dustin Kane Neeley | Bernie, MO 63822 | $88,626 |
60 | Pamela Kaye Mouser | Dexter, MO 63841 | $87,431 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”