Total Conservation Programs in Stoddard County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 189
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Stoddard County, Missouri totaled $1,111,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Gary Tucker | Puxico, MO 63960 | $5,432 |
62 | Jeffrey Holloway | Puxico, MO 63960 | $5,339 |
63 | , | $5,316 | |
64 | James W King | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $5,181 |
65 | Rozetta Little | Puxico, MO 63960 | $4,994 |
66 | Burch Real Estate Partners L P | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $4,940 |
67 | Gary D Reutzel | Advance, MO 63730 | $4,813 |
68 | Margaret Marie White | Bernie, MO 63822 | $4,792 |
69 | William Ben Embry | Malden, MO 63863 | $4,748 |
70 | Richard Todd Hancock | Puxico, MO 63960 | $4,717 |
71 | Brandon Middleton Revocable Trust | Advance, MO 63730 | $4,560 |
72 | Larry Massey | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $4,479 |
73 | Larissa Dawn Hawkins | Advance, MO 63730 | $4,341 |
74 | Moore Bess Farms LLC | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $4,280 |
75 | Billy Joe Sanders | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $4,265 |
76 | Mary L Hart | Advance, MO 63730 | $4,194 |
77 | Mitchell Hart | Advance, MO 63730 | $4,194 |
78 | Michael Wheetley | Puxico, MO 63960 | $4,187 |
79 | Buck And Faye Sifford Revocable Trust | Choctaw, OK 73020 | $4,142 |
80 | , | $4,117 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”