Market Loss Assistance Program in Stoddard County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,845
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Stoddard County, Missouri totaled $42,620,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Quincy Murphy Inc | Bernie, MO 63822 | $126,001 |
82 | Mph Fleeman Farms | Puxico, MO 63960 | $124,776 |
83 | Mark Rodrick Stutts | Essex, MO 63846 | $123,442 |
84 | Terry Blair Farms | Essex, MO 63846 | $123,123 |
85 | Ccg Farms Incorporated | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $122,146 |
86 | Seepwater Farms Inc | Bell City, MO 63735 | $119,143 |
87 | H Double J | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $119,005 |
88 | Barker Farms | Parma, MO 63870 | $118,952 |
89 | K & M Farms Inc | Dexter, MO 63841 | $118,897 |
90 | Rayburn Gene Wilson | Essex, MO 63846 | $118,787 |
91 | Jackson Brothers Farms | Dudley, MO 63936 | $117,852 |
92 | Dennis Harty | Dudley, MO 63936 | $117,315 |
93 | Doyle Junior Strickland | Essex, MO 63846 | $116,686 |
94 | Walter Lee Strickland | Essex, MO 63846 | $116,685 |
95 | Kenneth Wayne Parris | Dexter, MO 63841 | $116,192 |
96 | Crowley Rdg Fm Ag Ent Inc | Dexter, MO 63841 | $115,768 |
97 | Kip Colton Smith | Dudley, MO 63936 | $115,629 |
98 | Mcghee Farms | Essex, MO 63846 | $115,448 |
99 | Double K Ranch Inc | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $114,711 |
100 | Terry Lee Miller | Essex, MO 63846 | $113,081 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”