Farm Subsidy information
Stoddard County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Stoddard County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,121
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Stoddard County, Missouri totaled $28,346,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Darell Crow Farms | Dexter, MO 63841 | $49,719 |
102 | Shane D Garner | Advance, MO 63730 | $49,529 |
103 | Flowers II | Dexter, MO 63841 | $49,301 |
104 | Burleson Farms Inc | Dexter, MO 63841 | $48,791 |
105 | Michael H Mills | Bernie, MO 63822 | $48,787 |
106 | Timothy K Mayberry Revocable Trust | Dexter, MO 63841 | $48,714 |
107 | Keith Stubenrauch | Advance, MO 63730 | $48,180 |
108 | David T Mayberry Revocable Trust | Dexter, MO 63841 | $47,228 |
109 | Timothy Wayne Martin | Bernie, MO 63822 | $45,338 |
110 | Seepwater Farms Partnership | Bell City, MO 63735 | $45,068 |
111 | Nancy Parker Lemmons | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $44,804 |
112 | Charlotte S Mills | Bernie, MO 63822 | $44,277 |
113 | Nathan Tyler Harms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $43,996 |
114 | Mike Triplett Farm | Dexter, MO 63841 | $43,922 |
115 | Parker Cotton Company Partnership | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $43,748 |
116 | Danny Wayne Parker | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $43,745 |
117 | Mark Guethle | Dexter, MO 63841 | $43,678 |
118 | Rendleman Rev Trust U/a/d May 29 2014 | Oran, MO 63771 | $43,406 |
119 | Jeffrey M Bell | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $43,131 |
120 | Littleton Farming Ent. LLC | Parma, MO 63870 | $42,990 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”