Commodity Certificates in Stoddard County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 242
Recipients of Commodity Certificates from farms in Stoddard County, Missouri totaled $23,760,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Commodity Certificates 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | John Glen Allen | Catron, MO 63833 | $13,135 |
142 | David Christopher Martin | Bernie, MO 63822 | $13,088 |
143 | Hoggard Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $12,876 |
144 | Cara Lee Merritt | Essex, MO 63846 | $12,849 |
145 | Mara Lee Davis | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $12,572 |
146 | Paul August Rinck III | Parma, MO 63870 | $12,405 |
147 | Bobby Howell Aycock Jr | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $12,340 |
148 | Stewart & Stewart | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $12,040 |
149 | Jimmy Charles Goforth | Catron, MO 63833 | $11,879 |
150 | Borden Murphy | Bernie, MO 63822 | $11,833 |
151 | Smithco Farms Inc | Dudley, MO 63936 | $11,750 |
152 | T M Farms Inc | Essex, MO 63846 | $11,666 |
153 | Berry Don Murphy | Bernie, MO 63822 | $11,499 |
154 | Clarence F Myers & Hilda I Myers | Dexter, MO 63841 | $11,270 |
155 | John Neil Grindstaff | Bernie, MO 63822 | $10,829 |
156 | William Barry Aycock | Parma, MO 63870 | $10,531 |
157 | Martin Farms | Bernie, MO 63822 | $9,927 |
158 | Lonnie Ray Watkins | Essex, MO 63846 | $9,785 |
159 | James Howard Murphy | Bernie, MO 63822 | $9,532 |
160 | Linda Gaye Church Intervivos Trus | Dexter, MO 63841 | $9,190 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”