Farm Subsidy information
Stoddard County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Stoddard County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,121
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Stoddard County, Missouri totaled $28,346,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Michael & Cynthia Bell Farms | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $125,389 |
22 | Gary D Murphy II Farms | Bernie, MO 63822 | $121,559 |
23 | Michelle Dawn Aycock | Parma, MO 63870 | $119,190 |
24 | Parker Brothers Farm | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $116,920 |
25 | Bell Planting Company | Bell City, MO 63735 | $116,465 |
26 | Gary Murphy Farms | Bernie, MO 63822 | $107,707 |
27 | Castor River Farming Co | Dexter, MO 63841 | $99,413 |
28 | Fowler Farms Inc | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $98,898 |
29 | Bell Family Partnership | Van Buren, MO 63965 | $98,106 |
30 | Hollie Anne Conner | Essex, MO 63846 | $97,382 |
31 | Tom Hampton Farms | Dudley, MO 63936 | $97,278 |
32 | Rex Keller Jr & Clayton Keller Partnership | Dexter, MO 63841 | $95,180 |
33 | Chad Michael Maddox | Grayridge, MO 63850 | $89,579 |
34 | Ccg Farms Incorporated | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $87,761 |
35 | Laura Kay Bell | Essex, MO 63846 | $83,442 |
36 | Alliance Bank ** | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $82,981 |
37 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $82,666 |
38 | Robinson Farms | Dexter, MO 63841 | $81,902 |
39 | Donald L Cato Farms | Advance, MO 63730 | $81,073 |
40 | Allen Claude Below | Parma, MO 63870 | $80,940 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”