Farm Subsidy information
Stoddard County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Stoddard County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 4,399
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Stoddard County, Missouri totaled $824,081,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Fch Guethle Farms | Dexter, MO 63841 | $2,476,242 |
42 | Cunningham Farms | Dexter, MO 63841 | $2,458,260 |
43 | Keith Mayberry Farms | Essex, MO 63846 | $2,442,347 |
44 | David Keith Wheeler | Grayridge, MO 63850 | $2,436,812 |
45 | James Scott Wheeler | Grayridge, MO 63850 | $2,407,272 |
46 | Wilber Bradford Wheeler | Grayridge, MO 63850 | $2,404,246 |
47 | Allen Hampton Farms | Dexter, MO 63841 | $2,371,157 |
48 | Tom Hampton Farms | Dudley, MO 63936 | $2,325,754 |
49 | Dale E Young | Bernie, MO 63822 | $2,244,627 |
50 | Terry W Manes Farms | Essex, MO 63846 | $2,244,047 |
51 | Gary Murphy Farms | Bernie, MO 63822 | $2,216,829 |
52 | Tanner Planting Co II | Bernie, MO 63822 | $2,202,901 |
53 | Tracy Dale Young | Bernie, MO 63822 | $2,202,400 |
54 | John R & Charlene Morgan | Dexter, MO 63841 | $2,157,674 |
55 | H Double J | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $2,156,976 |
56 | Burleson Farms Inc | Dexter, MO 63841 | $2,119,299 |
57 | Bell Farms | Bell City, MO 63735 | $2,094,225 |
58 | Billy & Curtis Aycock | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $2,081,442 |
59 | Dustin Kane Neeley | Bernie, MO 63822 | $2,063,626 |
60 | Bell Planting Company | Bell City, MO 63735 | $2,046,465 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”