Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Stoddard County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 755
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Stoddard County, Missouri totaled $7,985,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Allen Hampton Farms | Dexter, MO 63841 | $52,202 |
22 | P And C Planting Company, LLC | Matthews, MO 63867 | $50,882 |
23 | Bell Family Partnership | Van Buren, MO 63965 | $49,740 |
24 | Castor River Farming Co | Dexter, MO 63841 | $48,964 |
25 | Mcgarity Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $48,184 |
26 | David Keith Wheeler | Grayridge, MO 63850 | $47,974 |
27 | Melina Gwen Wheeler | Grayridge, MO 63850 | $47,974 |
28 | James Scott Wheeler | Grayridge, MO 63850 | $47,974 |
29 | Wilber Bradford Wheeler | Grayridge, MO 63850 | $47,974 |
30 | Laurie Diane Wheeler | Grayridge, MO 63850 | $47,974 |
31 | Bell Planting Company | Bell City, MO 63735 | $47,221 |
32 | Jppl Inc | Bell City, MO 63735 | $46,183 |
33 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $45,085 |
34 | John R & Janet Davis Joint Venture | Dudley, MO 63936 | $44,208 |
35 | Parker Cotton Company Partnership | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $43,748 |
36 | Danny Wayne Parker | New Madrid, MO 63869 | $43,745 |
37 | Tom Hampton Farms | Dudley, MO 63936 | $43,596 |
38 | Marion Orr | Essex, MO 63846 | $41,713 |
39 | James W And M Kelley Corporation | Essex, MO 63846 | $40,643 |
40 | Louie Smith Inc | Dexter, MO 63841 | $40,586 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”