Counter Cyclical Program in Warren County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 740
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Warren County, Missouri totaled $1,383,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Schneider Bros Inc | Warrenton, MO 63383 | $63,016 |
2 | R Earl Requat And Lavelle M Requa | Wright City, MO 63390 | $32,245 |
3 | Schneider Farms Inc | Warrenton, MO 63383 | $30,737 |
4 | Heck Brothers Inc | Hermann, MO 65041 | $27,147 |
5 | R Ley Farms Inc | Washington, MO 63090 | $24,281 |
6 | Russell Ockerhausen | Warrenton, MO 63383 | $22,711 |
7 | Engelage Farms | Foristell, MO 63348 | $22,630 |
8 | Hans Hilltop Farm Inc | Jonesburg, MO 63351 | $22,158 |
9 | Gloe Farms Inc | Hermann, MO 65041 | $21,503 |
10 | Wilmer B Erfling | Hermann, MO 65041 | $20,610 |
11 | Niemeyer Farm Inc | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $19,868 |
12 | Jedwski Farms | Warrenton, MO 63383 | $18,460 |
13 | James Hellebusch | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $18,336 |
14 | Francis Liermann Trust | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $17,677 |
15 | Robert E & Wanda L Diermann Trust | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $17,560 |
16 | Dwayne Loehnig | Hermann, MO 65041 | $17,242 |
17 | Tuque Prairie Farms Inc | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $16,747 |
18 | Merlin Kopmann | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $16,739 |
19 | Eugene Randolph Fischer | Truxton, MO 63381 | $15,274 |
20 | Brakensiek Farm L L C | Wright City, MO 63390 | $15,168 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>