Farm Subsidy information
Washington County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Washington County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 462
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Washington County, Missouri totaled $3,460,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kelley Curtis Silvey | Potosi, MO 63664 | $136,210 |
2 | Jesse Jarvis | Belgrade, MO 63622 | $114,669 |
3 | William Bryce Nickelson | Belgrade, MO 63622 | $109,399 |
4 | Buford Farm Trust | Caledonia, MO 63631 | $107,401 |
5 | Charles B Friedman Revocable Inter Vivos Trust | Imperial, MO 63052 | $70,821 |
6 | Wayne Crump | Potosi, MO 63664 | $65,632 |
7 | Jonathan Turner | Belgrade, MO 63622 | $60,152 |
8 | James Chad Nickelson | Belgrade, MO 63622 | $48,966 |
9 | Bruce Woods | Potosi, MO 63664 | $46,077 |
10 | Edward And Blanche Rolwes Revocab | Chesterfield, MO 63005 | $44,081 |
11 | Marion Thomas Coleman | Caledonia, MO 63631 | $43,812 |
12 | Jeffrey Neier | Caledonia, MO 63631 | $41,637 |
13 | Courtois Catlle Co Inc | Steelville, MO 65565 | $40,472 |
14 | Lawrence Akers | Belgrade, MO 63622 | $39,124 |
15 | Christopher West | Potosi, MO 63664 | $36,924 |
16 | Daron L Dace | Bourbon, MO 65441 | $36,511 |
17 | Dean Bishop | Bourbon, MO 65441 | $34,782 |
18 | Larry Clarence Gilmore | Ironton, MO 63650 | $34,052 |
19 | Randall Leon Sutton | Potosi, MO 63664 | $28,691 |
20 | Ronald L Pashia | Potosi, MO 63664 | $27,535 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>