Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Webster County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 678
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Webster County, Missouri totaled $1,030,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gunter Dairy Gp | Conway, MO 65632 | $6,787 |
22 | Sees Farms | Marshfield, MO 65706 | $6,747 |
23 | M And M Land Company LLC | Elkland, MO 65644 | $6,520 |
24 | Keeler & Keeler Farms LLC | Marshfield, MO 65706 | $6,395 |
25 | Austin Keith Craven | Marshfield, MO 65706 | $6,272 |
26 | Leland Dull | Niangua, MO 65713 | $6,161 |
27 | Kenny Storie | Conway, MO 65632 | $6,144 |
28 | , | $6,087 | |
29 | Pete Luzaich | Marshfield, MO 65706 | $6,065 |
30 | Laura Lynn Diehl | Elkland, MO 65644 | $5,758 |
31 | Mottesheard Farms Inc | Marshfield, MO 65706 | $5,586 |
32 | Thomas Shockley | Niangua, MO 65713 | $5,212 |
33 | John Rick Huffman | Conway, MO 65632 | $5,070 |
34 | Amy Ragsdale | Seymour, MO 65746 | $5,047 |
35 | Trae Edward Sampson | Marshfield, MO 65706 | $5,043 |
36 | Walnut Ridge Farms LLC | Seymour, MO 65746 | $5,013 |
37 | Charlie Davis | Marshfield, MO 65706 | $5,001 |
38 | William Ted Stuber | Niangua, MO 65713 | $5,000 |
39 | Joshua Todd Burks | Fordland, MO 65652 | $4,571 |
40 | Panther Valley Services | Rogersville, MO 65742 | $4,538 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”