Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Webster County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 72
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Webster County, Missouri totaled $419,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kelsey Kindall | Fordland, MO 65652 | $935 |
42 | Russell Gene Callaway | Niangua, MO 65713 | $927 |
43 | Mike Dill | Niangua, MO 65713 | $894 |
44 | Jimmy Dean Horn | Seymour, MO 65746 | $890 |
45 | Williams Farm Operations LLC | Marshfield, MO 65706 | $825 |
46 | Reggie Bumgarner | Fordland, MO 65652 | $770 |
47 | Devin Clay Bushong | Seymour, MO 65746 | $754 |
48 | Jimmy R Vestal | Niangua, MO 65713 | $725 |
49 | Zachary Duane Scott | Fordland, MO 65652 | $712 |
50 | Curtis Chad Throne | Niangua, MO 65713 | $681 |
51 | R Reed Huffman | Marshfield, MO 65706 | $679 |
52 | Chris Harden | Marshfield, MO 65706 | $660 |
53 | Dwight Greer | Marshfield, MO 65706 | $660 |
54 | Nancy Wester | Fordland, MO 65652 | $646 |
55 | Diane Whitwer | Niangua, MO 65713 | $605 |
56 | Leslie Replogle | Niangua, MO 65713 | $540 |
57 | George Tunnell | Marshfield, MO 65706 | $529 |
58 | Carrie Dawn Ipock | Seymour, MO 65746 | $522 |
59 | James R Warren | Conway, MO 65632 | $454 |
60 | Kevin Dill | Niangua, MO 65713 | $442 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”