Market Loss Assistance Program in Worth County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 475
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Worth County, Missouri totaled $2,206,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Max Dawson | Worth, MO 64499 | $6,035 |
102 | Berniel Gabbert | Parnell, MO 64475 | $5,955 |
103 | J W Harding | Grant City, MO 64456 | $5,838 |
104 | Gareld D Riley | Hopkins, MO 64461 | $5,835 |
105 | Dennis Nonneman | Grant City, MO 64456 | $5,825 |
106 | Bernard Runde | Parnell, MO 64475 | $5,779 |
107 | Doug Runde | Ravenwood, MO 64479 | $5,579 |
108 | Norman-norman And Da Runyon | Sheridan, MO 64486 | $5,567 |
109 | J D Gladstone | Worth, MO 64499 | $5,478 |
110 | Roger C Fletchall | Sheridan, MO 64486 | $5,446 |
111 | James Brian Goodwin | Denver, MO 64441 | $5,421 |
112 | Gates Farms Inc | Mission Hills, KS 66208 | $5,396 |
113 | Patrick A And Roberta Sue Hardy Trust | Grant City, MO 64456 | $5,384 |
114 | B G Jones | Grant City, MO 64456 | $5,364 |
115 | Christopher Gerard Seipel | Ravenwood, MO 64479 | $5,315 |
116 | Philip Gerard Seipel | Ravenwood, MO 64479 | $5,315 |
117 | Rod Runde | Parnell, MO 64475 | $5,186 |
118 | Larry W Murphy | Sheridan, MO 64486 | $5,125 |
119 | Eldon Lee Thomas | Sheridan, MO 64486 | $5,107 |
120 | Trusten Wilkinson Farm Partnershi | Cameron, MO 64429 | $5,053 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”