Total Emergency Relief Program in Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 5,177
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Montana totaled $284,286,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Olivarez Honey Bees Inc | Orland, CA 95963 | $1,389,379 |
2 | Neufeld Farms Partnership | Larslan, MT 59244 | $1,283,447 |
3 | Brown Farms Of Montana | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $979,573 |
4 | Mac's Farm | Dutton, MT 59433 | $916,406 |
5 | Mccabe Joint Venture | Redstone, MT 59257 | $818,218 |
6 | Donald L Urbaniak | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $743,284 |
7 | Flat Acre Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $715,311 |
8 | Hilldale Colony Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $650,204 |
9 | Torgerson Farms Partnership | Ethridge, MT 59435 | $645,241 |
10 | T & C Cahill Farms | Scobey, MT 59263 | $619,847 |
11 | Wivholm Farms | Medicine Lake, MT 59247 | $611,796 |
12 | Springwater Colony Inc | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $602,878 |
13 | East Malta Hutterian Brethren | Malta, MT 59538 | $575,946 |
14 | Salvevold Incorporated | Culbertson, MT 59218 | $550,551 |
15 | Eaton Ranch | Lindsay, MT 59339 | $540,461 |
16 | Horizon Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $531,780 |
17 | Haynie Land And Grain LLC | Circle, MT 59215 | $519,130 |
18 | Travis Volk | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $502,331 |
19 | Kenny L Nielsen | Dagmar, MT 59219 | $493,790 |
20 | Kummerfeldt Farms LLC | Nashua, MT 59248 | $487,630 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>