Emergency Conservation Program in Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 307
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Montana totaled $8,785,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Sarah Kruger | Grass Range, MT 59032 | $79,168 |
22 | Gene E Davis | Terry, MT 59349 | $78,707 |
23 | Fs3 Land & Cattle Inc | Brockton, MT 59213 | $77,260 |
24 | Hidden Hollow Hideaway Cattle & Guest Ranch Inc | Townsend, MT 59644 | $76,629 |
25 | Mckamey West Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $76,283 |
26 | Bokma Grain Inc | Denton, MT 59430 | $74,507 |
27 | Remi Bidegaray | Brockton, MT 59213 | $71,287 |
28 | Joe And Anna Schmitz And Pat And Anna Burke Charit | Brockton, MT 59213 | $71,276 |
29 | , | $68,111 | |
30 | Wittmayer Grazing Assn | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $66,562 |
31 | Robert N Boie | Bozeman, MT 59715 | $64,775 |
32 | Cbd Ranch Inc | Scobey, MT 59263 | $64,522 |
33 | Christopher John Sramek | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $64,119 |
34 | Clark Brevig | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $62,633 |
35 | Mr Robert Ralston - Robert Ralston Rev Trust | Brockton, MT 59213 | $62,333 |
36 | Cassandra Lee Erickson | Ismay, MT 59336 | $60,474 |
37 | Glenda Vaughn | Westby, MT 59275 | $60,378 |
38 | Robert A Nagle | Circle, MT 59215 | $55,284 |
39 | Steven R Calkins | Plentywood, MT 59254 | $54,780 |
40 | M & M Livestock | Belt, MT 59412 | $53,010 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”