Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 5,275
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Montana totaled $110,269,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Schiffer Ranch Co | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $224,059 |
22 | Bill Webb | Malta, MT 59538 | $223,398 |
23 | Meissner Ranches 2 Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $215,958 |
24 | Walter Gruel & Son Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $209,641 |
25 | Obrecht Cattle Company, Inc | Turner, MT 59542 | $206,913 |
26 | Vermilion Ranch | Terry, MT 59349 | $204,495 |
27 | Salsbery Bros. | Malta, MT 59538 | $190,665 |
28 | J & L Livestock LLC | Billings, MT 59105 | $189,217 |
29 | Sheep Mountain Cattle Co | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $186,756 |
30 | Cayuse Livestock Co | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $184,661 |
31 | The Glennie Ranches | Two Dot, MT 59085 | $178,514 |
32 | Helle Livestock | Dillon, MT 59725 | $175,477 |
33 | Chevallier Ranch Co | Helena, MT 59604 | $174,349 |
34 | Snider Ranch Co | Hogeland, MT 59529 | $172,588 |
35 | Fredrick D Wacker And Gwendolyn K Wacker Dba Cross | Miles City, MT 59301 | $165,025 |
36 | Sitz Angus Ranch & Livestock Operation | Harrison, MT 59735 | $163,516 |
37 | Timothy G Todd | Ryegate, MT 59074 | $163,205 |
38 | Lehfeldt Land & Livestock | Lavina, MT 59046 | $159,350 |
39 | First Creek Ranch Inc | Saco, MT 59261 | $158,652 |
40 | Mccauley Ranches Llp | Boulder, MT 59632 | $156,949 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”