Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,357
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in Montana totaled $37,873,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Martinsdale Colony | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $121,990 |
22 | James Runningfisher | Browning, MT 59417 | $120,560 |
23 | Thomas Ranch Inc | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $118,502 |
24 | Smh Cattle Company, LLC | Polson, MT 59860 | $115,875 |
25 | Tim Mcinerney | Alzada, MT 59311 | $115,750 |
26 | Y 3 Cattle Co | Saco, MT 59261 | $115,709 |
27 | Lamont Anthony Herman | Saint Xavier, MT 59075 | $112,976 |
28 | The First State Bank Of Malta | Malta, MT 59538 | $112,495 |
29 | William Kougl | Busby, MT 59016 | $111,135 |
30 | Big-sky Kellam Land & Livestock Corporation | Chinook, MT 59523 | $111,102 |
31 | Walborn Cattle Co | Hardin, MT 59034 | $110,306 |
32 | First Interstate Bank ** | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $109,765 |
33 | Patterson Land & Livestock Co | Custer, MT 59024 | $106,391 |
34 | Andy Cole | Hays, MT 59527 | $105,403 |
35 | John W Young | Lloyd, MT 59535 | $103,949 |
36 | Huntsman Ranch Co | Dell, MT 59724 | $103,556 |
37 | Mcfarland & White Ranch Inc | Two Dot, MT 59085 | $101,487 |
38 | Shortgrass And Company | Lantry, SD 57636 | $101,438 |
39 | Lyle Neal | Lodge Grass, MT 59050 | $100,110 |
40 | Monty Jay Streeter | Ryegate, MT 59074 | $100,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”