Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 10,677
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Montana totaled $102,281,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Western Coop Credit Union ** | Williston, ND 58802 | $196,684 |
22 | O'hara Land & Cattle | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $189,964 |
23 | Brown Farms Of Montana | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $187,095 |
24 | Daniels-sheridan Federal Credit Union | Scobey, MT 59263 | $178,525 |
25 | Zenith Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $173,887 |
26 | Area 59 | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $157,956 |
27 | Hidden Lake Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $149,981 |
28 | Rasmussen Farms Jv | Antelope, MT 59211 | $136,372 |
29 | Camrose Colony Inc | Ledger, MT 59456 | $128,668 |
30 | Robert E Stephens Jr | Augusta, MT 59410 | $125,000 |
31 | Tyler G Stephens | Augusta, MT 59410 | $123,749 |
32 | Wangerin Brothers Inc | Outlook, MT 59252 | $119,961 |
33 | Twin Hills Colony Inc | Carter, MT 59420 | $119,836 |
34 | Growing Green Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $119,174 |
35 | Johnson Farms | Kremlin, MT 59532 | $119,096 |
36 | North Harlem Hutterian Brethren Inc | Harlem, MT 59526 | $118,152 |
37 | T & S Borlaug Bros | Gildford, MT 59525 | $116,720 |
38 | Brett H Debruycker | Dutton, MT 59433 | $111,545 |
39 | Kay L Debruycker | Dutton, MT 59433 | $111,543 |
40 | Flat Acre Farms Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $110,008 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”