Conservation Reserve Program in Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 18,793
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Montana totaled $2,323,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Van Voast Farm Partnership | Turner, MT 59542 | $1,304,754 |
62 | Linder Wheat Ranch | Flaxville, MT 59222 | $1,294,038 |
63 | J-d Farms | Sidney, MT 59270 | $1,283,577 |
64 | Brewer Ranch | Ringling, MT 59642 | $1,280,563 |
65 | N Hanging 5 Ranch | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $1,264,124 |
66 | Pester Brothers | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $1,254,428 |
67 | Fast Enterprises Inc | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $1,248,358 |
68 | Angela Farms Partnership | Billings, MT 59101 | $1,242,148 |
69 | J Harry Johnson Limited Partnership | Sidney, MT 59270 | $1,239,142 |
70 | Bill Mccarty | Scobey, MT 59263 | $1,236,709 |
71 | Fossen Brothers | Inverness, MT 59530 | $1,216,222 |
72 | Cybulski Brothers | Custer, MT 59024 | $1,210,999 |
73 | Jerry L Lankford | Dodson, MT 59524 | $1,203,261 |
74 | Adkins Ranch Inc | Nashua, MT 59248 | $1,196,518 |
75 | Kenneth Heydon Farms | Post Falls, ID 83854 | $1,187,891 |
76 | Horpestad Farms Inc | Lavina, MT 59046 | $1,170,446 |
77 | Bar V T Ranch Inc | Joplin, MT 59531 | $1,169,474 |
78 | Jim Shettel | Dodson, MT 59524 | $1,168,138 |
79 | Katco Farms Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $1,165,428 |
80 | Sharptail Ranch | Havre, MT 59501 | $1,161,125 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”